Thursday, April 07, 2011

DUI Appeal - Escaping an Illegal DUI Sentence in Wyoming

In Crosby v. State of Wyoming, 247 P.3d 876, 2011 WY 44, the defendant was illegally sentenced to 1 year of jail for his 3rd DUI, when the maximum offense was 180 days jail. He then escaped jail after serving only 2 days. He then filed a motion to dismiss his escape charges, arguing that the sentence from which he had escaped was void ab initio. Two issues where then put before the Supreme Court of Wyoming?
1. Whether the original sentence was void ab initio in its entirety, or is it an illegal sentence subject to correction?

2. Given that the escape charge in the above-captioned matter was filed at a time when the sentence was illegal, is it proper to continue the prosecution of the Defendant for escape, should this Court find that the original sentence was illegal and subject to correction?

The Court answered that the original sentence was subject to correction, and not void ab initio. Additionally, they also held that the filing of the escape charge was also allowable. The defendant also asserted that a previous case allowed him to attack the original sentence as void:

"Mr. Crosby asserts that we held otherwise in Endris v. State, 2010 WY 73, 233 P.3d 578 (Wyo.2010). There, Mr. Endris pleaded guilty to driving while under the influence of alcohol and the district court imposed a sentence allowing him to be released from jail to participate in a treatment program. The district court advised Mr. Endris that during his release for treatment he was on probation and in official detention. Mr. Endris was released but he did not attend the treatment program. His probation was revoked and he was convicted of escape. He appealed both the revocation and the escape conviction claiming the original sentence was illegal because it subjected him to probation and detention at the same time; therefore, he could not be convicted of escape."

Ultimately, the Supreme Court of Wyoming held that the defendant was subject to prosecution for escape despite the illegal sentence, since the escape occurred within expiration of lawful period of confinement. "We leave for another day the question of whether a prosecution can continue on an escape occurring after the legal portion of a sentence has been served." Paul Newman would have been proud of Mr. Crosby.


Visit Americas Top DUI and DWI Attorneys at http://www.1800dialdui.com or call 1-800-DIAL-DUI to find a DUI OUI DWI Attorney Lawyer Now!

No comments:

Blog Archive