In State of Tennessee v. Cox, Slip Copy, 2011 WL 4716284 (Tenn.Crim.App.) the appellate court affirmed a trial court ruling, holding that a Tennessee Valley Authority police officer had no jurisdiction to stop a vehicle outside of his jurisdiction. The state tied to argue that, like other police officers, the TVA police still have police power throughout the State. In distinguishing, the court relied on the enabling statute which provides that a TVA peace officer:
“shall have and exercise ... the power to make arrests for public offenses ... committed upon, about, or against TVA property or on public roads or rights-of-way passing through or over such property, and, while in pursuit of a person fleeing after committing such an offense, may pursue the person and make arrest anywhere in the state.... Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the authorities, responsibilities and liabilities of such officers shall be limited as provided for under this section.” (emphasis supplied)
The State then tried to use the 'citizen arrest' statute as an alternative basis for the stop. Unfortunately, the record made in the trial court by the prosecutor was poor:
"The State contends that even if Tennessee Code Annotated section 39–3–120 is not applicable, Officer Smith had the authority to make the stop pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40–7–109, the “citizen's arrest” statute. This claim is likewise unavailing. Tennessee Code Annotated section 40–7–109 provides that in limited situations, a private citizen may be authorized to make an arrest. However, as the defendant notes, the record provided on appeal does not reflect Officer Smith's reason for stopping the defendant, leaving us unable to determine whether there was a legitimate basis for the stop. Therefore, “this court must presume that the trial court's rulings were supported by sufficient evidence.” State v. Oody, 823 S.W.2d 554, 559 (Tenn.Crim.App.1991)
Editor's Note: This case is a good example of what a defendant should argue if the State tries to seek an alternate ground on appeal for reversal - keep in mind that most prosecutors at the trial level do not think about 'making a record' before filing a knee-jerk appeal. Looking for a Top DUI DWI Attorney? Visit Americas Top DUI and DWI Attorneys at http://www.1800dialdui.com or call 1-800-DIAL-DUI to find a DUI OUI DWI Attorney Lawyer Now!
America's Top DUI DWI Lawyers™ and Attorneys at 1-800-DIAL-DUI or www.1800dialdui.com have successfully defended thousands of DUI DWI and Drunk Driving Arrests in Ohio, Illinois, Texas, Michigan, Virginia, Massachusetts, Colorado, California, Nevada, Oregon, Minnesota, Iowa, Florida, New Hampshire, Virginia, Arizona and Maryland.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(289)
-
▼
December
(22)
- DUI Law - Illinois Sanctions Loss of Videotape
- DUI Law - Tennessee Limits Power of Police to Arre...
- DWI Law - New York Says Falure To Cross on Field T...
- DUI Law - Georgia Says Prosecutors Mistake Not Dou...
- DWI Law- Illegal Search Warrant Suppresses Blood D...
- DWI Law - Texas Holds HGN Cannot Be Used to Prove ...
- DUI Law - Defendant Represents Self - Blows Easy Win
- DWI Law - Minnesota OKs Stop From Stale Computer r...
- DWI Law - Stop for Touching Fog Line Criticized
- DUI Law - Mississippi Reverses Conviction For Susp...
- OWI Law - Illegal Entry Through Open Door Forces D...
- DUI Law - Illinois Suppresses Blood Test Without P...
- DUI Law - Use of Video Doesnt Violate Confrontatio...
- OWI Law - Wisconsin OKs Attack on Prior Conviction...
- DWI Law - Minnesota Says Pre-Arrest Silence Can Be...
- DUI Law - Arizona Says Illegal Stop for One Brake ...
- Florida Illegally Searches Grow House for Cannabis
- DUI Law - Connecticut Says Facebook OK to Revoke P...
- Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Fatalities On the De...
- DUI _ Mississippi Finds Driving Too Slow Stop Illegal
- DUIs take a big drop in Illinois
- DUIs take a big drop in Illinois
-
▼
December
(22)
No comments:
Post a Comment