In Maldonado v. State of Texas, --- S.W.3d ----, 2011 WL 924352 (Tex.App.-Dallas), the defendant filed a pretrial motion to suppress the dental records subpoenaed by the State, arguing the State failed to comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) On the day he was arrested, according to his dentist Garay who testified at trial, Maldonado had three wisdom teeth extracted and had received twenty milligrams of diazepam and one half milligram of Halcion. He was charged with DWI drugs, involving the diazepam and Halcion. Garay then testified that diazepam is a muscle relaxant and can cause drowsiness and dizziness. Halcion can also cause drowsiness and dizziness. Garay stated the dangers of driving under the influence of diazepam and Halcyon included the driver having vertigo, disoriented vision, and “just not [being] sure what [he is] doing.” According to Garay, both Maldonado and his wife were instructed that Maldonado could not drive a car after taking the medications and was required to have someone available to drive him home. Garay testified Maldonado signed an informed consent indicating he understood these instructions. The informed consent was contained in Maldonado's dental records.
First, the court held that the defendant had waived his challenge on appeal:
When the State offered the dental records into evidence at trial, Maldonado affirmatively stated that he had no objection. When a motion to suppress evidence is denied, the defendant does not need to object at trial to the same evidence in order to preserve error on appeal. Garza v. State, 126 S.W.3d 79, 84 (Tex.Crim.App.2004); Moraguez v. State, 701 S.W.2d 902, 904 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). However, when a defendant affirmatively states during trial that he has “no objection” to the admission of the complained-of evidence, he waives any error in the admission of the evidence despite the pretrial ruling. Estrada v. State, 313 S.W.3d 274, 302 (Tex.Crim.App.2010), cert. denied, 131 S.Ct. 905 (2011); Swain v. State, 181 S.W.3d 359, 368 (Tex.Crim.App.2005); Jones v. State, 833 S.W.2d 118, 126 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); Moraguez, 701 S.W.2d at 904.
Second, the court found that even if the challenge was ripe for review, they held that even assuming the records were improperly subpoenaed, Maldonado was not harmed by the admission of the dental records:
"It is well-established that the improper admission of evidence does not constitute reversible error if the same facts are proved by other properly admitted evidence. Brooks v. State, 990 S.W.2d 278, 287 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); see also Lane v. State, 151 S.W.3d 188, 193 (Tex.Crim.App.2004) (“An error [if any] in the admission of evidence is cured where the same evidence comes in elsewhere without objection.”) (quoting Valle v. State, 109 S.W.3d 500, 509 (Tex.Crim.App.2003)). Garay testified, without objection, about the drugs Maldonado received at the dental office, the potential effects of those drugs on Maldonado, and that both Maldonado and his wife were instructed that Maldonado should not drive a motor vehicle. Because the dental records were cumulative of Garay's testimony, Maldonado was not harmed by the admission of the records. We overrule Maldonado's two points of error and affirm the trial court's judgment."
NOTE: Apparently, the defense did not seek to exclude the dentist's testimony as 'the fruit of the poisonous tree' involving the unlawful subpoena (but perhaps should have). Thus, the issue involving HIPPA was left to die on the vine. Texas courts seem to have a way of finding waiver, forfeiture, and harmless error in every case where a defendant has possibly been wronged.
Visit Americas Top DUI and DWI Attorneys at http://www.1800dialdui.com or call 1-800-DIAL-DUI to find a DUI OUI DWI Attorney Lawyer Now!
America's Top DUI DWI Lawyers™ and Attorneys at 1-800-DIAL-DUI or www.1800dialdui.com have successfully defended thousands of DUI DWI and Drunk Driving Arrests in Ohio, Illinois, Texas, Michigan, Virginia, Massachusetts, Colorado, California, Nevada, Oregon, Minnesota, Iowa, Florida, New Hampshire, Virginia, Arizona and Maryland.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(289)
-
▼
March
(39)
- DC Prosecutors Used Questionable Breath Test Score...
- Out of Breath: Local attorney encourages students ...
- DWI Appeal - Objecting to Records using HIPPA and ...
- The value of hiring the Most Skilled Lawyer:
- DUI Appeal - Alaska DUI Hearing Officer Bars Evide...
- Suspended NM Appellate Judge Accused of Blowing Ov...
- Police in Fla. Town Use Email and Skype to Obtain ...
- OWI Appeal - Wisconsin OWI Stop Based On Weaving OK
- DWI Appeal - New York DWI Defense of Justification...
- DWI Appeal - Texas Rules Burden on Defense to Supp...
- DUI Appeal - Minnesota DWI Evidence Insufficient -...
- Defendants put the drunken driving test on trial -...
- DUI Appeal -Oregon DUII Cracked Windshield Stop Ch...
- DUI Appeal - Kansas DUI Arrest and Preserving Erro...
- DUI Appeal - Kansas DUI Jury Wrongly Instructed - ...
- DUI Appeal - Texas DWI Law Bars Refusal Instruction
- DUI Appeal - Texas DWI Failure to Signal Lane Change
- DUI Appeal - Massachusetts Drunk Driving, Refusing...
- DUI Appeal - Fog line 3 times, Stop Invalid
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - Hit-and-run, Disorde...
- Pennsylvania's Many DUI Drivers Devastate Families...
- Pennsylvania's Many DUI Drivers Devastate Families...
- Pennsylvania's Many DUI Drivers Devastate Families...
- DWI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - Sentence Increase in...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - Improper stop - alle...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD)- The Defense of Coercion
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - Estimation of Speed ...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - Failure to prove Imp...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - State deliberately d...
- DUI Appeal of the Day - Report of 'Drunk' Insuffic...
- DWI Appeal - Acquittal Reversed, But Failure to Pr...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - Warrant was “invalid...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - NHTSA Manual Barred
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - License Plate Coveri...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - When is a bad judge ...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - "You Are Under Arres...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - Roadblock approved b...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) Driver in Car Being To...
- DUI Appeal of the Day (DAD) - Missing CDL Language...
-
▼
March
(39)
No comments:
Post a Comment